Analysis | A fight in Missouri shows the damage of overbroad hacking laws – The Washington Post Leave a comment

A newsletter briefing on cybersecurity news and policy.
A newsletter briefing on cybersecurity news and policy.
Welcome to The Cybersecurity 202! We’re barreling toward Halloween. A coronavirus vaccine vial isn’t the most original costume idea, but I’ve seen far worse.
Below: Microsoft is reporting on a Russian hacking campaign aimed at software supply chains and Facebook executives declined to take some steps to curb misinformation. 
When the St. Louis Post-Dispatch uncovered dangerous bugs in a state website, Gov. Mike Parson (R) lashed out at the newspaper rather than at the education department’s shoddy security.
Parson’s response illustrates the perils that routinely face researchers who expose hackable security vulnerabilities in government and industry websites. 
The bug discovered by the Post-Dispatch could have given malicious hackers access to the Social Security numbers of roughly 100,000 state educators, exposing them to identity theft and other fraud. The newspaper alerted the state’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education about the bug before publishing to minimize the potential damage. 
But Parson went after the paper. He claimed it had violated a state anti-hacking law, ordered an investigation by the State Highway Patrol’s digital forensic unit and said his administration had spoken to a prosecutor in Cole County, which includes the state capital, Jefferson City. 
Such attacks are a common experience for cybersecurity researchers who try to root out bugs in company apps and websites before malicious hackers exploit them. There are two main reasons:
“The governor’s office is trying to divert attention from the fact they left people’s Social Security numbers exposed and they’re criminalizing good reporting,” Tor Ekeland, an attorney who specializes in defending people accused of computer crimes, told me. 
“I’ve had numerous clients who think they’re doing something for the public good exposing information like this. And because people or institutions that had bad information security are embarrassed, they go and kill the messenger.”
Most hacking laws were written long before the modern Internet. That often makes it tough to figure out what counts as hacking and what doesn’t. 
According to the Post-Dispatch story, the reporter accessed the Social Security numbers through a common flaw in the source code of a database designed for looking up teacher pay records. Source code is typically viewable by simply right-clicking on a Web page or clicking the F12 key. 
Parson painted the action as far more nefarious on Twitter. He cited a Missouri law that criminalizes accessing personal information without permission — apparently even if the information was left accessible on the open Internet. 
That reading would essentially make it a crime to alert any organization about a serious security flaw without the organization’s prior permission.
The logical result: Websites in Missouri would almost certainly be far less safe. 
“For cybersecurity research, it would be very poor policy to criminalize this,” Jeffrey L. Vagle, a Georgia State University law professor who focuses on cybersecurity law, told me. “This is the sort of thing you want researchers doing.”
Parson’s office declined my request for comment, citing the ongoing investigation. 
A spokeswoman shared Parson’s statement on Twitter that the case is “more than just a ‘right click’” and that “an individual accessed source code and then went a step further to convert and decode that data.”
Parson’s supporters, meanwhile, are doubling down on his attacks
A political action committee created by Parson supporters published a video set to dramatic music that described the tumult this way: “Gov. Parson is standing up to the fake news media and is committed to bring to justice anyone who obtained private information.”
There’s been some progress reining in the main federal anti-hacking law
That law, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), dates to 1986 and has long been the biggest deterrent to cybersecurity researchers. 
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in June that significantly narrowed how courts should interpret the statute, though cybersecurity advocates say the ruling left too much uncertainty in some cases.  
Previously, some judges and prosecutors have interpreted the CFAA so broadly that critics argue it would make it illegal to violate a dating site’s terms of service by lying about your height or an employer’s computer rules by checking personal email at work. 
The hackers have targeted “resellers and other technology service providers that customize, deploy, and manage cloud services and other technologies on behalf of their customers,” Microsoft executive Tom Burt said in a blog post this morning. “Since May we have notified more than 140 resellers and technology service providers that have been targeted,” Burt wrote.
In April, the U.S. government said Russia’s foreign intelligence service was behind the SolarWinds breach.
A U.S. government official described the Russian operations detailed by Microsoft as simplistic attacks that cloud service providers could protect against with basic cybersecurity measures. 
“Based on the details in Microsoft’s blog, the activities described were unsophisticated password spray and phishing, run-of-the mill operations for the purpose of surveillance that we already know are attempted every day by Russia,” the official said.
Newly obtained documents suggest the company acted too quickly to lift checks limiting the spread of misinformation after the 2020 election. The company wasn’t prepared for false information and incitements to violence on Jan. 6 when Trump supporters stormed the capitol, Craig Timberg, Elizabeth Dwoskin and Reed Albergotti report. Facebook denies that it was responsible for the Jan. 6 riot.
Some of the decisions to not curb harmful content can be traced back to CEO Mark Zuckerberg, my colleagues report this morning. In April 2020, Zuckerberg “appeared to shoot down or express reservations about researchers’ proposals to cut down on hate speech, nudity, graphic violence and misinformation,” they report, citing a Facebook document. 
One of NSO Group’s clients probably successfully used the company’s Pegasus spyware to infect Ben Hubbard’s phone on July 12, 2020. The spyware infected his phone ​​again on June 13, 2021, researchers from Citizen Lab say. Hubbard is the Times’s Beirut bureau chief and wrote a book about Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman last year.
Both hacks came after Hubbard wrote in 2020 that he was targeted by NSO spyware. The company denied the earlier claims. It also denied the latest report, telling Hubbard that he “was not a target of Pegasus by any of NSO’s customers” and the findings amount to “speculation.”
Hubbard writes: “As far as I know, no harm has come to any of my sources because of information that may have been stolen from my phone. But the uncertainty was enough to make me lose sleep.” 
NSO clients have used Pegasus to target journalists, activists and business executives, according to an investigation by The Washington Post and 16 news organizations.
The report came as top French and Israeli officials held talks over Pegasus.
An Israeli proposal ”included a commitment to ban the hacking of French mobile phone numbers in any future spyware deal between an Israeli firm and a third country,” Axios’s Barak Ravid reports.
Israel has come under pressure after French security agencies found traces of Pegasus on the phones of five French government ministers. 
Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen argues that the company’s plan to expand the strongest form of encryption on its messaging service could stymie the company’s ability to trace government espionage operations, the Sunday Telegraph’s Mike Wright reports
As a Facebook executive, Haugen tracked Chinese government harassment of Uighurs through Facebook Messenger. Haugen, who said she is generally in favor of encryption, is set to testify before the U.K. Parliament this morning.
Context: The U.S. and U.K. governments have long taken aim at Facebook’s encryption plans, which government officials say will hamper law enforcement’s ability to investigate crimes including the spread of child abuse material. Cybersecurity advocates say limiting encryption will make Facebook customers more vulnerable to hacking. 
U.S. officials caution companies about risks of working with Chinese entities in AI and biotech (Ellen Nakashima)
The sheikh, the businessman and a hacking mystery on 3 continents (The New York Times)
Facebook sues Ukrainian who scraped the data of 178 million users (The Record)
A rare win in the cat-and-mouse game of ransomware (The New York Times)
Vodafone sues U.K. after losing bid for hack-proof state hotline (Bloomberg)
Tesco website hit by hackers, leaving thousands of customers frustrated (The Guardian)
Ransomware gang says the real ransomware gang is the federal government (Motherboard)
Apple’s privacy change is hitting tech and e-commerce companies. Here’s why. (Wall Street Journal)
Just make sure you wear it again four weeks after Halloween. Thanks for reading. See you tomorrow.
The most important news stories of the day, curated by Post editors and delivered every morning.
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *